A pastor, Oni Muyiwa, has been docked by the police in Ekiti after his wife, Alabi Adejoke, reported a case of domestic violence and threats to life against him.
The pastor, who was also described as a perennial divorcee who manipulates women’s wealth to his advantage, was dragged before an Ado-Ekiti Customary Court.
The President of the Court, Mr. J.O Oyedele, dissolved the three-year-old marriage between the couple.
He ordered that both parties go their separate ways without disturbing each other.
In his judgment, Oyedele said, “The respondent is hereby restrained from going to the petitioner’s house after he might have taken all his belongings out of the house.
“The custody of the only child of the association is hereby awarded to the petitioner and the respondent shall have access to the child.
“The court hereby ordered that the Toyota Camry car under the custody of the respondent is to be collected immediately and same given to the petitioner.
READ ALSO: Four ATM Card Fraudsters Arrested In Enugu
“The court hereby declared that the house 3-bedroom flat being, lying and situates behind School of the Handicap belongs to the petitioner absolutely.
“The court hereby declared that the two plots of land being, lying and situates at Idolofin community land belongs to the petitioner and family receipt is hereby ordered to be issued in the name of the petitioner.”
NIGERIACRIME gathered that the estranged wife approached the court through her counsel, Iyanu Olumuagun on October 11, 2022.
The petitioner told the court to put an end to her marriage to the health worker and also order him to leave her house.
The court discovered that the respondent cannot be trusted and his testimonies were full of lies during cross-examination.
“With all the answers given by the respondent shows he is a liar and his evidence cannot be relied on: why could the respondent deny knowing a woman who gave birth to his first son, known as Oni Samuel Okikiola? Why will he also deny knowing Modupe, his first wife?” The court said.
However, the defendant said the petitioner did not have any car but he acquired the car while cohabiting with her.
The defendant informed the court that it was not true that only the petitioner was responsible for education and the welfare of the child.